Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning.
نویسندگان
چکیده
A key question for cognitive theories of reasoning is whether logical reasoning is inherently a sentential linguistic process or a process requiring spatial manipulation and search. We addressed this question in an event-related fMRI study of syllogistic reasoning, using sentences with and without semantic content. Our findings indicate involvement of two dissociable networks in deductive reasoning. During content-based reasoning a left hemisphere temporal system was recruited. By contrast, a formally identical reasoning task, which lacked semantic content, activated a parietal system. The two systems share common components in bilateral basal ganglia nuclei, right cerebellum, bilateral fusiform gyri, and left prefrontal cortex. We conclude that syllogistic reasoning is implemented in two distinct systems whose engagement is primarily a function of the presence or absence of semantic content. Furthermore, when a logical argument results in a belief-logic conflict, the nature of the reasoning process is changed by recruitment of the right prefrontal cortex.
منابع مشابه
Solving Valid Syllogistic Problems using a Bidirectional Heteroassociative Memory
Classical syllogistic reasoning, also known as Aristotelian reasoning, is of particular interest in cognition. Such reasoning, which can seem simple at first, is known to be associated with high error rates. Although some research has been done on this topic, the underlying mechanisms used by human beings remain largely unknown. To understand the underlying cognitive properties associated with ...
متن کاملWhere Syllogistic Reasoning Happens An Argument for the Extended Mind Hypothesis
Does cognition sometimes literally extend into the extraorganismic environment (Clark, 2003), or is it always “merely” environmentally embedded (Rupert, 2004)? Underlying this current border dispute is the question about how to individuate cognitive processes on principled grounds. Based on recent evidence about the active role of representation selection and construction in learning how to rea...
متن کاملA specification-aware modeling of mental model theory for syllogistic reasoning
Computational cognitive models can embody the structures and processes proposed in a cognitive theory. However, they do not necessarily reveal the theory’s underlying assumptions and specifications. This study aims to bridge the gap between cognitive theory and its computational implementation, focusing on a case of mental model theory on human reasoning. Using a mathematics-based and staticall...
متن کاملThe probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning.
A probability heuristic model (PHM) for syllogistic reasoning is proposed. An informational ordering over quantified statements suggests simple probability based heuristics for syllogistic reasoning. The most important is the "min-heuristic": choose the type of the least informative premise as the type of the conclusion. The rationality of this heuristic is confirmed by an analysis of the proba...
متن کاملThe Fuzzy Syllogistic System
A categorical syllogism is a rule of inference, consisting of two premisses and one conclusion. Every premiss and conclusion consists of dual relationships between the objects M, P, S. Logicians usually use only true syllogisms for deductive reasoning. After predicate logic had superseded syllogisms in the 19th century, interest on the syllogistic system vanished. We have analysed the syllogist...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- NeuroImage
دوره 12 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000